Young People And Text Messaging. Again.

Odd story this one, can half see the point of it, but half think it’s going to go horribly wrong. Basically, Crimestoppers and Lancashire Police have just launched a service allowing young people to text a number to report someone at their school carrying a knife.  The text will be anonymous, and is meant to help the police deal with knives in schools. On a superficial level, it’s yet another of those bizarre ‘young people and text messaging’ projects, which imply that somehow using a new technology will make young people want to take part in it more. As if young people can’t bear to speak to people face to face. Or non young people don’t have mobile phones. A very odd premise.To be fair though, it does have more of a purpose than the massive disasters of young people and text message based consultation that have littered the world of e-democracy for too long, and will doubtless continue to do so for a while longer yet. In this project, the young person will at least see a result from sending a text.The main problem, at least on first reading, is that if the text’s sent in a genuinely anonymous manner, then the service is at best just asking for kids to send in false accusations against people for a joke, and at worst a way for gangs to play out battles with each other by setting each other up, potentially increasing the tension between them. Which may be resolved through more knife fights. Perhaps that’s too much of a leap of faith, and it’s always hard to gauge the exact details of how something like this will run from a brief news story, perhaps they have these points covered. At the same time though, the point always bears repeating, never confuse what a technology can do with what it actually does effectively and well. Technology is only ever a side issue to the planning of a process.

This entry was posted in Tips & tricks to help you. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Young People And Text Messaging. Again.

  1. It is also leaves me wondering just how anonymous a text message can be. Presumably it means you don’t have to put your name to it, but you are hardly going to feel that you are untraceable (even if you throw your mobile phone away immediately after having sent the text message).

  2. Gez Smith says:

    Yeah, guess you could use a new pay as you go sim card bought with cash and then disposed of afterwards, but otherwise you will be traceable. Thinking about it again, anonymous probably means they just won’t tell anyone it was you that reported it, but if you do it maliciously then you may well be traced and charged with wasting police time at best.

    Will be interested to see if it’s actually used and if it works.

  3. tricia says:

    The oddest part of this is the fact that your are able to demonise young people so freely. Why is your automatic assumption that young people will miss-use technology? The most important part of meaningful engagement is reaching people in a medium or situation in which they feel comfortable- if young people are more comfortable remaining anonymous in a technology does not judge them so easily, then so be it. Young people struggle to have a voice in a society that despises them, perhaps you are right- technology is a side issue- the real issue is the prejudice and fear that has stopped them interacting with society in the first place.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>