I’m just back from this event, getting together the ‘great and good’ of the Bristol digital media community to discuss what the council should do with its new website.
The backstory is that the council has seen that its current site doesn’t fit what is needed either internally or externally, and so they’re currently in procurement for a new CMS. After that, they’re up for suggestions from the digital community on what more could be done with it and their general web presence. They’re very much trying to avoid the unfortunateness that happened to Birmingham City Council, where they launched a new (and seemingly very expensive) website, only to have the local digital community rip it to pieces, criticize it massively, then build a better alternative over a weekend. As ever, you’ve got to wonder how good that weekend build would have been if used properly, but as a proof of concept it was interesting.
So, thoughts on the meeting.
First off, it seemed really positive, the council seems keen to engage with new ideas and are genuinely open to suggestions, that came across very clearly. Excellent stuff.
The thing is though, it may be that there’s still a bit of a learning curve for them with some of this. We broke into group sessions, and the first thought of our group was along the lines of ‘so the new CMS you’re procuring will be open source right? Or else we can’t do much with it really…’. Cue slightly blank and worried faces.
There were also concerns that the cart is being put before the horse somewhat, in that they’re getting a new site and perhaps not articulating clearly enough at the moment who the new site is for. In internet parlance, what are the user cases for the site?
They were talking about freeing up the data the council holds in all sorts of areas, so I suggested that they give us their google analytics account password. Someone else chipped in and said they should release the SOCITM user experience survey data that’s collected too. They seemed to agree, but will be interesting to see if that happens. If they want our help as a community with the new site though, then we need to know what they know first.
Another interesting thing that came up was the idea of getting council staff involved in this process. It was mentioned in the presentations that lots of areas of the council have things they’d like to do with the new site, but that was as far as it went. How about council staff are allowed to submit ideas publicly about what the new site should do, and then us digital lot can comment on and help the staff refine those ideas? Cut out the middle people in this process, as the free sharing of ideas is what helps drive innovation after all.
Given that some of the people in the room were the same people who have in the past banned council officers from blogging about their work at the authority, it has to be hoped that a culture shift has taken place since, as getting real staff involved in ideas for the site would be a real benefit. Apparently some staff are, or at least were as far as I know from a couple of months ago, restricted from accessing the council’s own consultation site http://askbristol.wordpress.com, the sort of thing that will have to change if a true crowd sourcing process or free exchange of ideas is to take place across the authority on this.
One thing that also come up though was the notion of whether the council actually needs a website at all? Sure, it needs a channel for paying council tax, parking fines and providing core bits of info, like when the bins are collected and so on. But beyond that, Bristol is a city of bloggers and micro journalists. How about the people of Bristol provide the content in lots of areas, and the council just facilitates the finding of it? The council has an events listings page, how about the content for it is automatically put into it from Bristol sites that already list events through using RSS feeds, rather than it just being something the council can post to?
Similarly, many years ago I bought some domain names that were pertinent to a site that would aggregate all of the content from blogs in Bristol in realtime, along the lines of www.libdemblogs.org.uk. The idea was to aggregate content from across the city, and provide basic info on blogging to get more people out there blogging about their local area. The council’s welcome to have these domain names if it fancies helping facilitate the use and aggregation of blogs in Bristol, and encouraging more people to get active in talking online. A quick win no doubt.
Similarly, we want to add twitter integration into our consultation finder system we built for the council, to open consultations out to that communication channel too. Another quick win for a small amount of work.
So, there are some thoughts on what the council’s going, where it should go, and two quick wins it could do right now. It was a great meeting though, really looking forward to getting involved in more of the debate!
Gez – I think we were in the same group; I too had much the same response coming away from the meeting as you.
All positive and I wholly support BCC engagement with the digital community at this stage.
In all, I think the council are right to engage with the digital community early on in this process – to have comments such as this and start the ‘conversations’. However what they really need to implement now is to tools to engage with the citizenship and all other stakeholders – both internal and external.
More research from the end users please….so with that in mind, we fully support the idea of helping the council go about gathering feedback from the wider community in the city to take to the next stage.
We – the digital community – should be commissioned to build those tools to help this process along and also aid in the analysis on that data. Only then will BCC have the information needed to develop a user centered approach that can deliver a sustainable ‘digital strategy’.
Look forward to the digital dialogue.
I’m Bristol City Council’s communication and marketing director – and was one of the co-hosts of today’s event that Gez has blogged about.
Yeah Gez – you’re right – a bit of a learning curve for us. Thanks for the acknowledgment that at least we’re confident enough to admit we don’t know everything, and go looking for some wisdom from ‘the crowd’.
On the issue of whether our new content management system (CMS) will be open source – it’s less that we’re avoiding the subject or failing to understand the question – it’s that we’re consciously ‘technology agnostic’ (a great phrase someone used today which I’m happy to steal and claim as my own). We’re half way through a procurement exercise for a new CMS where we’re specifying the outcomes and functionality, and letting the market pitch us the best technical solution. We might end up with open source, we might not – but we’ll decide on the basis of the best case made to us, rather than reaching a firm view before the market has spoken.
The point though was well made that if we want a lasting engagement with the wider digital community, and if we’re serious about opening up council data – we need to work with prevailing and accessible data standards, api’s, code etc.
Today was a first go at engagement with the Bristol digital community on this topic – so we deliberately left the agenda flexible. Be reassured though that we got the message – as the engagement moves forward, we need to add in some structure to focus the debate.
Gez elegantly slings down a gauntlet that if we’re serious about listening, we need to do things like share our google analytics and SOCITM survey data. I accept that challenge. We’re debriefing here on Thursday, so watch this space for some progress.
@Peter,
That’s great, all sounds really positive. To be honest, the fact that an officer at your level is happy to respond to and discuss these things publicly is probably one of the most exciting innovations I’ve seen come out of the council for a long time. Huzzah!
All feels really positive this. If the digital community can be a ‘critical friend’ to the council, as I believe the Best Value Review terminology had it, then I think we’re on a win win for all sides.
@ Al
If you were in a group with a dood with a mohican, then yep, we were in the same group! Glad my thoughts echoed yours, looking forward to more discussion of this ‘going forward’ as they say.
Peter / Gez
I believe BCC have not only a technical challenge but also a cultural challenge.
A shift that has to be made from inside the organisation; to become transaparent, collaborative and open. To become evidence based & user centered in terms of how you provide services and information. To try to avoid reverting back to a broadcast method. This in turn will inform your technical delivery.
Great to see some ‘ conversation’ developing from the workshop.
All very positive.
Peter – It would be interesting to explore how we – the digtial community -can aggregate this dialogue for you and open the discussion up?
Twitter – hashtag for following up on Tuesday’s BCC web strategy consultation #bccweb
Thanks Al
@akopen
@Open_Comms
Pingback: Welcome to our new blog « Bristol City Council
Hi Gez, we have already linked our twitter (and wordpress site) to Consultation Finder using feedburner
All new entries on Consultation Finder are automatically tweeted.
Have a look http://www.twitter.com/askbristol
Pingback: Camden’s website re-design | Delib Blog
Pingback: The Top Ten Posts On The Delib Blog For 2010 | Delib Blog